Interesting perspectives on socializing ideas. However, it seems to contradict the independence of judgment principle of the wisdom of crowds. Pursuing conformity through cultural norms and iterative socialization risks reducing diversity and encouraging groupthink, which undermines the collective intelligence that independent judgments enable. Perhaps there's a balance between making ideas accessible and allowing them to be evaluated on their intrinsic merits.
There’s an interesting difference in scale here. A crowd is wiser if all of its members make judgements independently. This isn’t true of individual members, who would be more influential if they iteratively (good addition, btw) socialized their ideas across the group.
Interesting perspectives on socializing ideas. However, it seems to contradict the independence of judgment principle of the wisdom of crowds. Pursuing conformity through cultural norms and iterative socialization risks reducing diversity and encouraging groupthink, which undermines the collective intelligence that independent judgments enable. Perhaps there's a balance between making ideas accessible and allowing them to be evaluated on their intrinsic merits.
There’s an interesting difference in scale here. A crowd is wiser if all of its members make judgements independently. This isn’t true of individual members, who would be more influential if they iteratively (good addition, btw) socialized their ideas across the group.